Ahead of the Threat Foreign Policy Logo
  • Sign In
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Podcasts
  • The Magazine
  • Channels
  • Newsletters
  • Live
  • Events
  • FP Analytics
  • FP Insider Access:
  • Power Maps
  • Special Reports
  • Graphics Database
  • FP Events
  • FP Studios
  • FP Analytics
  • FP PeaceGames
  • Subscription Services
  • Group Subscriptions
  • Reprint Permissions
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • FP Guides – Graduate Education
  • FP For Education
  • FP Archive
  • Buy Back Issues
  • Work at FP
  • Meet the Staff
  • Advertising/Partnerships

REPORT
COUNTRIES
SHIELD
DASHBOARD

The SHIELD Framework

EY designed the SHIELD framework to help understand national preparedness and strategic readiness ahead of evolving threats. Inspired by previous and existing military scholarship, including the work of Dr. Thomas P. Galvin at the U.S. Army War College and others, the SHIELD framework is not a measure of military readiness alone, but a structured way to understand how effectively national power can be mobilized at speed—before conflict, during crisis, and through prolonged high-intensity competition. SHIELD provides a lens to understand how nations align warfighting readiness with a wartime-capable economy, innovation and procurement adaptation, coordinated use of national power, human capability and skills flexibility, and domestic and capability resilience. Together, these dimensions describe the extent to which a nation is prepared to both respond to an imminent threat or crisis and sustain strategic effect and operational advantage when needed.

The SHIELD framework assesses this challenge across six critical dimensions. Each letter in SHIELD corresponds to a domain that contributes to two connected outcomes: the ability to ahead of emerging threats, and the ability to mobilize and sustain national effort under pressure. The SHIELD framework underpins the analysis found in the report, country case studies, and data dashboard, helping to guide the design of survey and interview questionnaires and open-source data collection.

The six dimensions of SHIELD are:

SHIELD

Strategic Readiness and Decision Velocity

Advance from deterrence to full-spectrum warfighting readiness by integrating multi-domain forces, designing rapid decision cycles, and institutionalizing the agility to deploy, sustain, and adapt ahead of the speed of evolving threats—with the discipline, agility, and integrated management characteristic of high-performing enterprises

SHIELD

Human Capability and Skills Flexibility

Build a defense ecosystem that enables reliable, flexible access to critical skills at scale and with the ability to expand, rebalance, and contract the workforce rapidly— through pipelines, upskilling, talent mobility, and surge-ready staffing arrangements across military, civil service, and industry.

SHIELD

Innovation Translation and Procurement Adaptation

Translate research-based innovation into operational adoption and scaling of disruptive technologies – through agile procurement, experimentation, and collaboration across government, industry, and academia.

SHIELD

Economic Mobilization

Finance and build a wartime-capable economy with sovereign industrial capacity, resilient stockpiles, and production surge capacity—leveraging defense infrastructure investment as a driver of growth.

SHIELD

Leverage Over National Power

Synchronize diplomatic, informational, military, and economic levers of national power to enable both defensive and offensive strategic options, strengthen alliances and partnerships, and safeguard sovereign capability—through institutional and legal alignment for coordinated decision-making and action.

SHIELD

Domestic and Capability Resilience

Strengthen deterrence by building the validated ability to withstand, continue operating during and recover from cyber, physical, and economic disruption across critical infrastructure, defense-relevant economic output, and combat power generation—continuously improving through regular stress tests and mobilization exercises across stakeholders and society.


JUMP TO A COUNTRY

Australia
Canada
France
Germany
Norway
Singapore
Sweden
United Kingdom
United States

Ahead of the Threat

FP Analytics, the independent research division of Foreign Policy LLC, produced this special report with support from EY. FP Analytics retained control of the findings of this report. Foreign Policy’s editorial team was not involved in the creation of this content.

Back to Foreign Policy Magazine home page
  • Bluesky icon Follow FP on Bluesky
  • X icon Follow FP on X
  • LinkedIn icon Follow FP on LinkedIn
  • Instagram icon Follow FP on Instagram
  • Facebook icon Follow FP on Facebook

FP SOLUTIONS

  • FP Analytics
  • FP Events
  • FP Studios
  • Simulations and Peacegames
  • Advertise with FP
  • Country Reports

Subscription Services

  • Your FP Account
  • Group Subscriptions
  • Reprint Permissions
  • FP Magazine Archive
  • Buy Back Issues

EDUCATION

  • Graduate Education Guide
  • FP for Education
  • Institutional Access

ABOUT FP

  • Writer's Guidelines
  • Meet the Staff
  • Work at FP
  • Contact FP
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
  • Bluesky icon Follow FP on Bluesky
  • X icon Follow FP on X
  • LinkedIn icon Follow FP on LinkedIn
  • Instagram icon Follow FP on Instagram
  • Facebook icon Follow FP on Facebook

Foreign Policy Magazine is a division of Graham Holdings Company. All contents (c) 2026, Foreign Policy LLC, a unit of Graham Digital Holding Company. All rights reserved. Foreign Policy, 1099 14th St NW, Suite 500 East, Washington, D.C., 20005.

Powered by WordPress VIP